Just imagine having the
ability to choose between a girl or a boy. With today’s science, this is
already happening during in vitro fertilization. But what if we look just a
step beyond? Can we select a baby that will be stronger, more beautifully
featured or less prone to certain diseases? And above all else, is this
ethical? These are questions that are beginning to surface as genetic testing
moves forward.
Google Square Ad
Embryonic screening takes place
during in vitro fertilization. It has previously been called pre-implantation
genetic diagnosis (PGD). When an egg is fertilized in the lab, it is allowed to
grow for a small amount of time. Once it is a few days old, a cell is removed
from the embryo for genetic defect testing.
From there, embryos can be chosen
for their genetic makeup and implanted in to the woman. For some, this is a
dream come true. For instance, couples who both carry the gene for cystic
fibrosis can select an embryo that does not contain this trait. There are also
other life threatening disorders that can be screened for – protecting the
future infant from a life of pain and ultimate death.
In a study of about 180 fertility
clinics in the United States, 75 percent of them use embryonic screening.
Sixty-six of these screenings were performed to rule out chromosomal
abnormalities due to a previous family history. Forty two percent of these
clinics used it to offer gender selection and twenty four percent looked for
genetic matches for siblings in need of a transplant.
This screening process has caused
an emotional debate between wide varieties of groups, from political to
religious to scientific. Is it ethical to choose an embryo that has a lower
potential for developing Alzheimer’s disease late in life? What if you can stop
a family’s deadly hereditary cancer right in its tracks? People are talking,
and the jury is still out.